<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" 	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LHC could be running by August 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://genevalunch.com/blog/2009/05/01/lhc-could-be-running-by-august-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://genevalunch.com/blog/2009/05/01/lhc-could-be-running-by-august-2009/</link>
	<description>Community Newspaper Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:18:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GenevaLunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Antimatter stars at Cern&#8217;s Globe</title>
		<link>http://genevalunch.com/blog/2009/05/01/lhc-could-be-running-by-august-2009/#comment-27531</link>
		<dc:creator>GenevaLunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Antimatter stars at Cern&#8217;s Globe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 05:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://genevalunch.com/?p=16292#comment-27531</guid>
		<description>[...] instants after the Big Bang. The LHC was damaged when it started up in September 2008 but could be restarted in August [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] instants after the Big Bang. The LHC was damaged when it started up in September 2008 but could be restarted in August [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What went wrong (and what&#8217;s next) at the Large Hadron Collider: Brian Cox&#8217;s update on TED.com : Osservatorio Meeting Point</title>
		<link>http://genevalunch.com/blog/2009/05/01/lhc-could-be-running-by-august-2009/#comment-26893</link>
		<dc:creator>What went wrong (and what&#8217;s next) at the Large Hadron Collider: Brian Cox&#8217;s update on TED.com : Osservatorio Meeting Point</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 12:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://genevalunch.com/?p=16292#comment-26893</guid>
		<description>[...] C&amp;#69RN announced th&amp;#97t the L&amp;#97rge &amp;#72&amp;#97dr&amp;#111n C&amp;#111llider (which spect&amp;#97c&amp;#117l&amp;#97rly &amp;#102&amp;#97iled [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] C&amp;#69RN announced th&amp;#97t the L&amp;#97rge &amp;#72&amp;#97dr&amp;#111n C&amp;#111llider (which spect&amp;#97c&amp;#117l&amp;#97rly &amp;#102&amp;#97iled [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What went wrong (and what&#8217;s next) at the Large Hadron Collider: Brian Cox&#8217;s update on TED.com : Osservatorio Meeting Point</title>
		<link>http://genevalunch.com/blog/2009/05/01/lhc-could-be-running-by-august-2009/#comment-26885</link>
		<dc:creator>What went wrong (and what&#8217;s next) at the Large Hadron Collider: Brian Cox&#8217;s update on TED.com : Osservatorio Meeting Point</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 11:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://genevalunch.com/?p=16292#comment-26885</guid>
		<description>[...] CE&amp;#82N a&amp;#110&amp;#110ou&amp;#110&amp;#99ed that the Large Ha&amp;#100ron Colli&amp;#100er (which &amp;#115pectac&amp;#117larly faile&amp;#100 la&amp;#115t September) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CE&amp;#82N a&amp;#110&amp;#110ou&amp;#110&amp;#99ed that the Large Ha&amp;#100ron Colli&amp;#100er (which &amp;#115pectac&amp;#117larly faile&amp;#100 la&amp;#115t September) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.genevalunch.com @ 2012-02-11 02:31:32 -->
