The Nobel Prize for Economics did not make its customary trip to the free market apostles at the University of Chicago. Instead it recognized two things not always understood by economists: women and the public interest in common resources. The Nobel panel chose two American professors: Elinor Ostrom from Indiana University and Oliver Williamson from Berkeley, part of the University of California. Ostrom has specialized in the field of common-pool resources, which can suffer from congestion and over-use. Her work was developed from a study of dams in Nepal and can be applied to many areas of  sustainable development such as fishing grounds and bio-diversity. Her work stresses that local communities often manage resources better than government bureaucracies.

Williamson has focused on the importance of transaction costs and developed a critique of the view that corporations are solely driven by the profit motive. Both economists deal with institutions as complex bodies with sometimes conflicting aims. The Nobel panel denied being greatly influenced by the current economic crisis but it might well have decided it was not the right time to again reward the Chicago School of economics.

Links: Nobel Prize in Economics

Posted by :: Nicholas Bates on 12 October 2009 at 15:13 | permalink
        Post Comment  
 

News story, GenevaLunch, 12 October 2009.

Filed under: World news

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

We are happy to have your comments, which are approved before they appear: please remember to be courteous and brief. We accept only comments directly related to an article. We do not accept comment spam - messages sent to more than one site. Thank you!
POST A COMMENT

 

<< GO BACK