By Peter Gaechter
The news that the Basque separatist group, ETA, had called for a ceasefire last Sunday, 5 September caused little commotion in the Spanish capital, Madrid. The Spanish government rejected ETA’s offer as “insufficient” saying the armed group had not unequivocally renounced the use of violence.
The story behind the news was that Sinn Fein, the political wing of the erstwhile Irish Republican Army, which waged its own decades-long armed struggle against Great Britain, had been “heavily involved” in ETA’s decision to put down its arms, “the culmination of years of debate, discussion and strategising among Basque activists”, according to Gerry Adams, the Sinn Fein leader writing in the Guardian 6 September.
Why Spain won’t accept the ceasefire as is
Adams is optimistic and urges the Spanish government to seize the opportunity to enter into a political dialogue with ETA. The Spanish government is understandably reticent: experience, including the breaking of two previous ceasefires called by ETA in the past dozen years, argues against it; politics stays its hand too: the political right in Spain is not willing to cede an inch on the matter, and Spain’s ruling Socialists are in for a drubbing over the economy in next year’s elections.
ETA is on four different “designated terrorist” lists. Sinn Fein met with ETA “in the Basque country, sometimes in Belfast, and on a number of occasions in recent years Sinn Fein representatives travelled to Geneva for meetings with Basque representatives”. According to a strict interpretation of a recent US Supreme Court ruling, such activity may be illegal.
A sometime armed non-State actor. Photo by Alan Light
A sometime armed non-State actor. Photo by Alan Light
What is material support?
Holder v. the Humanitarian Law Project, a case that was ultimately decided by the Supreme Court in June 2010, argued that portions of the USA Patriot Act of 2001 were too vague. The Humanitarian Law Project argued that sitting down and talking to armed groups who are on the State Department’s terrorist lists could not be viewed as criminal activity. The Supreme Court held in July that providing “material support” to an armed group, which may include legal or other advice, frees up resources that the group may use to further its violent cause.
Correct. But in Sinn Fein’s case it may have been providing advice about a peace process that worked out relatively well. In other words, the advice seems to have been clearly to convince ETA that a ceasefire may be an important first step in a political process that could actually save lives.
Don’t criminalize dialogue
Other actors are also involved in furthering peace processes. Many NGOs need to talk to armed rebel groups in order to negotiate terms for humanitarian assistance of some sort or another. The International Red Cross springs to mind, as do countless others who operate in conflict zones around the world. Denying these groups the possibility of at least talking to armed groups because they appear on the designated terrorist group list seems short-sighted and counter-productive. Past US actions now also seem hypocritical. For years, the IRA raised funds openly in the USA to the chagrin of the British government.
What happens next? It is unlikely that Gerry Adams is going to be held up by Homeland Security officials at JFK airport the next time he visits the USA. But what exactly is the US government’s position on close ally Afghan President Hamid Karzai’s subtle dealings with the Taliban in that benighted country? What would happen if the US military found it expedient to open a dialogue with the Taliban itself? It strikes me that the US Supreme Court has painted itself into a very sticky legal corner.
By Bill Harby
Expatch, the Swiss (mis)adventures of a CH-ophile writer & photographer from Hawai’i
I’ve been doing a lot of driving recently, and am happy to say that I am no longer terrified of causing an international fender-bender incident because I didn’t know whether a certain sign meant I was going the wrong way on a dead-end street, which, if you think about it, is impossible anyway, even though I’m pretty sure I was doing exactly that the other day on a street with alarming red and blue signs apparently telling me not to proceed and not to go the opposite direction.
Negotiating Swiss streets requires speed-reading. There are signs over the road and beside the road, and even signs written right on the road. It’s kind of like playing 3-D chess. Fighter pilots are required to have superb “3-dimensional situational awareness.” Ditto for European drivers, for whom the next piece of life-saving information could be written virtually anywhere, including on that window-box of tulips outside the neighborhood bordello.
My favorite European traffic device is the ubiquitous rond-point. This is a circle of roadway that appears at many intersections. Instead of having to hit the brakes at a stop sign even if you can see that there’s not another vehicle within hundreds of meters, drivers decide for themselves whether or not they can safely glide into the circle and proceed to their chosen connecting street without infringing upon the grillwork of another driver. Even better, a rond-point is often covered with a mound of beautiful flowers or an interesting mosaic of bricks or stonework, allowing traffic to freely flow around it like chi around a lovely mandala.
Indeed, in the USA we sometimes call the rond-point a “traffic-calming circle,” or a “roundabout.” But mostly we don’t call it anything because it mostly doesn’t exist in our country.
In Hawai‘i, my previous home, there is little that is calming about such circles. When the county government announced plans to put in only the second roundabout in the state, certain concerned citizens all but mounted an insurrection, sending out a public letter calling on their neighbors to resist this crazy foreign idea, and instead “order up four stop signs … and tell the mayor and the Neighborhood Board to go away.”
But why do Americans have such antipathy towards this obviously efficient and graceful traffic device?
One day a few years ago, after considerable rond-point traffic observation from the vantage point of a Parisian sidewalk café table eventually festooned with carefully arranged empty wine glasses standing in for traffic cones, I figured out why Europeans love the roundabout and Americans loathe it. Europeans love it because they get to make their own Existential choice whether to brake or play poulet with that tilting Heineken truck heading around toward them. It’s that liberté thing. In the U.S. of A., we prefer a good sturdy stop sign because it’s completely clear what we’re supposed to do. Plus, it gives us excellent supporting evidence for our personal injury lawsuit.
In Peseux, the village just downhill from my house, there’s a place where two rond-points nearly touch each other. Together they form a sort of figure-eight. Or an infinity sign. I have to admit that this arrangement is rather too deep for me to comprehend yet. So tomorrow I plan to drive around both of them until things clarify — or until I’m chased down by a cop. But I’m sure that won’t be a problem. Certainly we’ll both be very calm.
Nyon Film Festival 2009
Jared Bloch
Visions du Réel Film Festival
Peter Kerekes’ film, “Cooking History,” opens with an elderly German baker and World War II veteran proclaiming, “German bread is the best in the world.”
The film then cuts to the baker and three other war veterans trekking through the forest and singing battle hymns.
photo courtesy of Visions du Réel 2009
Nyon film festival 2009
by Jillian Hudson
The very essence of waiting and wanting seep through the screen in Bettina Haasen’s, “Hotel Sahara.” Heart-stopping cinematography coupled with a haunting soundtrack made this a film to remember. Haasen gives a voice to the dreams and desires of Africans in the westernmost point in Mauritania where they wait to attempt an illegal crossing to Spain by sea.
Nyon Film Festival 2009
Jared Bloch
The sound of dogs barking throughout sets the tone for this bleak film by Mathias Montavon and Marianne Thivillier. A bombed out or otherwise disintegrated Georgian infrastructure in a nameless city, serves as backdrop for the poetic text provided by Thivillier via a narrative voice.
Amazingly, according to Thivillier, the text was largely the product of spontaneous musings on the themes of war and destruction and was not written specifically as a counterpart to the imagery in the film, which is at least as bleak as the text. The dog howls add perfectly to the narrative depicting human regression to a feral state.
photo, courtesy of Visions du Réel 2009
Nyon film festival 2009
by Jillian Hudson
“Spaghetti alle Vongole” was an excellent first attempt for director Lila Ribi. The camera captures her father’s severe depression and his difficulty in communicating with his daughter. Ribi manages to convey her feelings of disappointment and sadness at the lack of a father during her childhood as well as her desperation to establish a relationship with him now.
The sadness and the frustration are palpable in the intimate scenes in her father’s kitchen where it’s just a girl asking her father to let her in to his life. It was a very brave move for Ribi to take on a project that hit so close to home. If her father had been willing she could have taken the story even further.
photo, courtesy of Visions du Réel 2009
Nyon film festival 2009
by Jillian Hudson
Yu Guangyi’s documentary “Survival Song” is a shockingly candid view into the lives of a Chinese working class family who has been forced to live in poverty and misery in the name of a new and modern China.
photo provided by Visions du Reel 2009
photo provided by Visions du Reel 2009
Nyon film festival 2009
by Jillian Hudson
“Cash and Marry” is the humorous portrayal of a man’s search for an EU (European Union) bride at all costs. Director and main character Georgiev Atanas calls upon his Bosnian friend Marko who is currently living in Vienna, Austria to help him find a bride who will give him papers to live and work in the EU.
Flickr.com, CCL, Mr. Kris
This post appeared on brandingthroughpeople. Author Ago Cluytens has previously shared posts from his marketing blog with GenevaLunch.com
“Oh Father, I have sinned. It has been several weeks since my latest post.”
Lately, I have been experiencing a severe case of writers’ block, which has caused me to interrupt my usually steady flow of blog posts. For those of you that are regular followers of this blog, I sincerely apologize. I guess I could tell you that a lot has been happening in my life lately, but that does not justify not posting for such a length of time.
Still, sometime good came out of it: this morning, I started reflecting on the importance of being trustworthy and dependable in business (and personal) relationships. Recently, I have experienced several moments where people have been extremely reliable, but unfortunately also a few where they turned out to be completely the opposite.
Republished with permission
by Ago Cluytens, on brandingthroughpeople.com
Ago Cluytens is the global head of marketing for a major international financial institution. His current responsibilities span across marketing, internal and external communications, branding and PR.
On brandingthroughpeople.com, Ago shares insights into how companies can create brand engagement through motivated and engaged employees – where marketing meets human resources.
flickr.com CCL dev null
I had an interesting conversation last week, during which I was forced to spend about ten minutes explaining why I did not agree with the statement that the finance industry was full of corrupt and money-grabbing nihilists that felt no sense of remorse about “what they did”.
It got me to thinking: why is it that the actions of an isolated few taint the perception of so many ? Even in Geneva, formerly known as the “Mecca of Private Banking”, the phrase “I work in finance” seems to have lost much of its previous lustre.