Ellen Wallace
Ellen Wallace
 

The havoc they wreak or wreaked or wrought? For some reason the word havoc loves to snuggle up to the words wreak and wrought, and since Iceland’s now-famous volcano has been causing havoc, I’ve seen wreak and wrought far more than is normal. Both are correct.

So what’s the difference? Wrought has a nice gothic touch to it, I think, which seems to suit dragon-breathing works of nature. Wreak/wreaked is more common. The sense of the two words as verbs is now generally considered the same, with wrought sometimes thought of as the past tense of wreak. The first definition for both is generally “work”.

They didn’t start out together, with wrought once having a clearer sense of worked, while wreak is often used to mean cause, to bring about.

Definitions: wreak, wrought

Examples of use:

Volcano wreaking havoc on science meetings, Science Magazine

The volcanic ash cloud that wrought havoc . . ., Metro.co.uk

Posted by :: Ellen Wallace on 10 May 2010 at 17:19 | permalink
        Post Comment  
 

GenevaLunch, 10 May 2010.

Filed under: Misused words

Tags: , , , ,

Both comments and pings are currently closed.

We are happy to have your comments, which are approved before they appear: please remember to be courteous and brief. We accept only comments directly related to an article. We do not accept comment spam - messages sent to more than one site. We do not publish comments if the e-mail address is not legitimate. Thank you!